(a) ZM 2005-002 Rezone:
A request to rezone a .89 acre parcel from R-20 to a B-3 zoning
classification. Location: 118 Matthews-Indian Trail Road. Applicant:
V-3 Corporation Passed (Note: the
applicant, V-3 Corp. includes Councilmember Vickery so she abstained
from voting on this issue)
(b) ZM 2005-003 Rezone:
A request to rezone a 1.0 acre parcel from R-20 to a B-4 commercial
zoning classification. Location: 6601 Old Monroe Road, Tax Parcel
#07-090-006B. Applicant: Sun Valley Commons, LLC.
Passed
(c) CUD 2004-006 MHL Development:
A request to develop an R-6 CUD on 22.31 acres located on Pioneer
Lane. The project consists of 74 single-family lots. Location 4825
Pioneer Lane. Applicant: MHL Development.
Voted to Delay until next month (July 12th) based on
letter that "a key individual was unable to attend tonight's meeting."
However,
one theory says that since Councilman Kindley was absent and (we
believe) Councilman Helms must excuse himself from this vote (due to
direct financial interests), MHL knew that this left only three
voting council members and therefore, any two NO votes would have
defeated this project. As the theory goes, MHL decided it was
"safer" to wait a month when presumably Councilman Kindley will be
present. If you buy into this theory then you must ask how MHL
knew that Councilman Kindley was going to be absent? Who
alerted them to this? Their request to postpone seemed very
"last minute". This was on the town's agenda, many parties
both for and against were assembled to discuss and debate this
project and at the start of the meeting, MHL was allowed to "delay"
this to next month's agenda. I suppose this could have been
perfectly legitimate. However, I believe this matter warrants
some investigation. Who exactly from MHL was "unable to
attend" and why? Exactly when did the town receive the
"request to delay"? Did MHL have knowledge of the fact that
Councilman Kindley would be absent? If so, who told them and
when? Doesn't this set a bad precedent to allow an applicant
with little or no advance notice, to manipulate the date of their
public hearing based on which council members may or may not be in
attendance?
(d) SUP 2004-011M Gibson
Amendment: A request to amend an approved Special Use Permit
(2004-011) which authorized a 31-lot single-family residential
subdivision on 14.59 acres. The applicant is requesting to amend
conditions 16, 18 and 21 of the original conditions of approval.
Applicant: Reece Gibson. Location: Future Phase of chestnut Oaks
located on Chestnut Lane, Indian Trail.
Passed (note: twice the council was
split two/two and both times Mayor Moore cast her tie breaking votes
in favor.)
(e) CUD 2005-002 Walgreen
Conditional Use District: A request to establish a B -4
Conditional Use District for the development of a pharmacy store.
Applicant SBBH, LLC; Location: Southeast corner of Wesley Chapel and
Old Monroe Road. Deleted from Agenda
(not sure if this means it's dead or if it can come back next month)